Hi JoAnne and Jim,

I agree Jim, JoAnne is one busy lady and is out there fighting to keep the US the land of the free and the home of the brave.

In my previous post I did use the word levity and you're quite right it's not funny and retract that and remain with the truisms.

What has been an underlying factor throughout B Hussein's campaign and now during his tenure in the White House is if you disagree with him you're a radical, extremist, terrorist, astroturfer, birther and now more and more we're hearing that we're racists. Even more now after peanut brain Carter the worst president the US ever had came out and says it live on TV. Well we consider the source and it's not worth much at all yet this is a theme floating out in the stratosphere and pulled out of the hat when ever needed and boy does B Hussein need it now.

Below is a list of "sins" that if you believe in one of them or God forbid all of them you're a racist and I must admit I believe in all of them. Hmmmmmm, I guess that makes me a racist.

Shalom,

Peter

You might be a racist

If you think the constitution protects your rights to arm yourself ....you might be a racist!..

If you think that a czar is unconstitutional
... you might be a racist!

If you are opposed to a government run health care system
... you might be a racist!

If you think that it is unAmerican to bow before the Saudi King
... you might be a racist!

If you think that the stimulus plan has been an utter failure
... you might be a racist!

If you think that this administration is driving the deficit up at alarming rates
... you might be a racist!

If you think that this is a nation based on Christian values
... you might be a racist!

If you think that communism and socialism are NOT the solution
... you might be a racist!

If you value the 1st Amendment, but think that the media is state-run
... you might be a racist!

If you are sick and tired of the race card being played
... you might be a racist!

If you are a racist according to the current liberal agenda
... you might just be an American!

Yes, some households should be visited as extended help to the Department of Children Welfare ~ some words were left out of the bill Sec. 440

"... would provide grants to states to establish home visitation programs to educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills. The “well-trained and competent staff” will:

…provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains…modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices; [and] skills to interact with their child…"

I highly doubt, due to the current state of the International Economy, every household with young children will be visited.

Priority households most likely would those who are receiving public assistant ( also claim not to have family support, support of young children father(s) and can not obtain gainful employment because of lack of education. i.e., high school drop-outs )

Since the parent of these young children are allegedly home, taking care of their minor children; what's the issue with having parental guidance support?

Collectively, there are too many young people wasting their lives in prisons, on the streets and reproducing more children ~ with NO MEANS to properly care for off-springs.

Tax Payers funds invested in young children today, can diminish tax maintinance of babies that grow up

• to make more babies
• to become revolving door criminals
• to be high school drop-outs
• drug distributors
• spread HIV

Communites are already burden with young children; who grow up with two parents that are also guilty of all of the above.

At least give young children, of single parents, a chance to grow up to become responsible community members.

Every One Make a Difference

Jim ~ "the schools was supposed to address those issues" ~ NOT MY CHILDREN ~ "schools" do not make children, I introduce these subject matters 1st ~ when ever the "school" does ~ it has been 2nd hand info.

I vowed NOT to allow the outside world; B the 1st to rob my children with mis-information. 

In addition to helping them deal with their peers; I also coached them on how to deal with difficult aged adults ~ all of my children have known since kindergarten ~ "some children do not grow up, they just get old" ~ this included school teachers, many did not have children of their own and I do not doubt their talent for passing their own certifications to qualify earning their degrees; however, I do dismiss their qualifications to shape the future of my children ~ Yeshua gave them to me.

Hoping YOU got that ~ I do NOT assume all young parents are just as dedicated to shaping the future of their off-spring; being that some help in that direction beats zero ~ I support visits to young, single parents to help them; help their children grow up ~ not just get old.

About that "Kool Aid" ~ no rush, thank you.

Quote:
Jan I thought "Planned Parenthood and Sex Ed" in the schools was supposed to address those issues.  So are you saying more bureaucracy and money will now work?  WHY HAS IT NOT thus far?  Jan, you have drank the Kool Aid haven't you?

e